4/18/2023 0 Comments Checkmate atheists![]() What is this ideal look like? Is it the pursuit of this ideal proof of God's existence? The fact that churches within Christianity alone can't agree on what God even is proves to me that the definition of God is not something to just be assumed as agreed upon. Conflating the idea of "Soul" with "Higher Purpose" can work in some instances, but the existence of a higher purpose doesn't mean the existence of a soul.Īnother conflation of language is that of "God" with the Ideal state of things. There is a lot of conflation of language here, that I don't think lends your argument much credibility. REMEMBER NONE OF THIS IS TRUE, FOOLISH LIES THAT MAY TRAP THE UNWARY!!!! No, it was the meaning that created the matter not the matter that created the meaning, to say the matter is more important is idiotic! Html is not physically real but without it you could not read this. Pi is not physically real but it very much is a real thing or you would not have circles. You might say it is not physicaly real so it is all make belive. The idea of an anthromorphic being would be the way an overiding ideal would probablly be represented in the basic human mind without artificial rendering of the universe and of course the nature of our "souls" would co-incide to an extent with the over-riding principles of the universe. Some might claim the world has changed since then so it is obselete, I would largely disagree on the grounds human nature and basic human interactions and the fundemental nature of the universe has remained constant. The trouble with emergent behaviour is that it is incredibly difficult to predict so anyone thinking they know better than billions of years of evoultion (the "soul") better have very strong evidence before they should be taken seriously. It seems the Abrahamic religions and a copule of others are the ones that resonate most strongly with peoples "souls", "souls" that are the product of eons of brain evoultion. The "soul" having a supposed evoultionary advantage should then ultimately also follow certain behaviours in the pursuit of a the aformentioned end, the "God". Then came humans who have the power to control their impulses and to describe the universe at least to an extent. Life emerged from it and by natrual selection were forced to behave in certain ways ultimately to the same end. This principle was largely followed unconsiously for eons until we have the universe as we know it. Is it suprising many people claim to see God in everything? This ideal could be seen as a sort of "God". The particles could be said to follow a certain set of laws following a certain ideal. Subatomic particles behaving in certain ways that lead to either them not destroying themselves or creating more subatomic particles and then going on to create more complex structures which in turn went on to create more complex structures etc. Peoples "souls" generally seek to follow the ways of "good", what is "good"?Īccording to some it is most likely a series of complex behaviours which give an evoulutionary advantage to tribes and individuals. This phenomona could could reasonably be described as having a "soul". Old sigline: I've been cutting back on the drinking.People are almost never purely motivated by physical stimuli they always see themselves as having a higher purpose even if they are hardcore nihilist athiest "rationalist" types. (are bad run-on sentences a symptom of CTE? I hope not.) So in conclusion, we don't know FOR SURE what causes CTE or how to avoid it, but mom was probably right in not letting me play football, though I went out and found other new and exciting ways to concuss myself, so hopefully it wasn't too many and I don't forget my name when I'm 40. Is that why they were chosen? Article doesn't make that clear, but it seems like a decent assumption. While it's hard to parse out from that article how the players/brains were chosen for the study, I think it is telling that it's only 21 former Sabres and Bills (I did appreciate the jokes in the comments about Bills not tackling) who it mentions were cognitively well off while they were alive. It seems that there are two types of studies-those done on brains that were submitted to whoever either by the player or their family, and the decision to donate was related to the former player's or family's concern about how they acted and desire to determine if there was something wrong.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |